Sister Act: Park First and Links to Store First


Within this article, we explore the disconcerting realm of mis-sold claims surrounding Park First, an investment offering intricately linked to the notorious Storage Pod investment, Store First. Park First, operating as an unauthorised Collective Investment Scheme (CIS), has come under the intense scrutiny of the esteemed Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Embark on this journey with us as we unveil the complexities of the FCA's intervention, delve into compensation agreements, and shed light on the hurdles encountered by investors who placed their faith in this investment endeavour.

The FCA Intervention and Park First Restructuring

Park First's operation as an unregulated Collective Investment Scheme caught the attention of the FCA, leading to an intervention in an attempt to protect investors. The FCA deemed that Park First's operation as a CIS required regulatory compliance, which it lacked at the time.

Consequently, the FCA ordered Park First to restructure the investment scheme, offering investors the choice to either enter into a new arrangement or seek a refund for their investments.

Legal Proceedings and Compensation for Investors

In October 2019, the FCA initiated court proceedings against Park First Ltd, the CEO, senior managers, and affiliated companies, aiming to secure compensation for affected investors. Recently, the FCA has announced a conditional agreement with the defendants, which would make an additional £25 million available for compensation to approximately 4,500 investors impacted by the failed Park First Scheme.

However, this agreement is contingent upon the approval of Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs) by Park First investors, providing them with a say in the acceptance of these arrangements and the conditional agreement.

The Plight of Investors and the Park First Scheme's Collapse

Around 4,500 investors, including individuals who invested their life savings, found themselves embroiled in the controversial Park First scheme. Promising attractive returns of 8-12%, the scheme involved the sale of parking spaces near airports at a considerable cost of £20,000 each. Unfortunately, the FCA declared the scheme illegal in 2016, leading to the collapse of four Park First companies into administration in subsequent years.

As a result, investors faced significant financial losses, amounting to millions of pounds collectively.

Affiliated Companies and Further Administrations

A network of affiliated companies emerged in connection with Park First, each playing a role in the development and operation of the investment scheme.

These companies include: Harley Scott Residential Limited (previously known as Park First Glasgow Limited), Park First Skyport Limited, Cophall Parking Gatwick Limited, Park First Management Limited, Paypark Limited, Limited, Group First Global Limited, Park First Freeholds Limited, Park First Glasgow Rentals Limited, Park First Gatwick Rentals Limited, Help Me Park Gatwick Limited, Airport Parking Rentals (Gatwick) Limited, and Paypark Limited.

Some of these companies entered administration at various stages, further exacerbating the challenges faced by investors.

The Intricate Link Between Park First and Store First

Park First's connection to its sister company, Store First, adds another layer of complexity to the mis-sold claims surrounding the investment. Store First, a storage pod investment, faced its own controversies and regulatory interventions in the past. Investors who were entangled in the mis-selling of Store First may find themselves similarly affected by the mis-sold claims of Park First. The intertwining nature of these sister companies raises questions about the practices and oversight that allowed such mis-selling schemes to occur. As investors seek justice and compensation, it becomes essential to examine the broader context of the relationship between Park First and Store First, shedding light on the potential impact and interconnectedness of these investment products.

The Impact on Investors and the Pursuit of Justice

The mis-sold claims surrounding Park First have had a profound impact on the lives of thousands of investors. Individuals from diverse backgrounds, including diligent workers and retirees, placed their valuable savings and pensions into the Park First scheme, with hopes of achieving a stable and prosperous future. Regrettably, the anticipated returns of 8-12% proved to be an illusion, leaving investors disillusioned and disheartened.

When the FCA declared the scheme illegal in 2016, shockwaves reverberated throughout the investor community. The subsequent collapse of the four Park First companies into administration deepened the financial losses suffered by investors. What was once seen as a potentially lucrative investment transformed into a nightmarish ordeal, leaving investors devastated and uncertain about their financial well-being.

In the aftermath of the Park First scheme's collapse, affected investors faced an uphill battle: seeking justice and compensation for their losses. However, there is a glimmer of hope on the horizon. The FCA's conditional agreement with the defendants presents a potential breakthrough, with an additional £25 million earmarked for compensation. This development marks a significant step forward in the pursuit of redress.

However, the journey to justice is not without its challenges. Investors must actively engage in the Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs) proposed by the affiliated companies. These CVAs grant investors a voice, enabling them to influence the acceptance of the arrangements and the conditional agreement. It is imperative for investors to make well-informed decisions and carefully consider the options presented during this critical process.

Our committed team of seasoned professionals is here to accompany and assist you throughout the intricate terrain of mis-sold claims. We offer tailored support at each stage of the claims process, empowering investors with the essential resources and knowledge to make well-informed choices regarding their financial future.

We firmly believe that every investor deserves the opportunity to seek justice and fair compensation. Our unwavering commitment to advocating for investor rights drives us to work tirelessly on behalf of those who have suffered financial losses. With our extensive knowledge of the Park First scheme and expertise in navigating complex legal matters, we strive to empower investors and provide the guidance needed to navigate this challenging journey.

If you find yourself among the thousands of investors impacted by the Park First mis-selling failures, we encourage you to reach out to our dedicated team. Together, we can explore your options, assess your eligibility for compensation, and develop a customised strategy to pursue the justice and compensation you rightfully deserve. Your financial well-being matters to us, and we are here to support you every step of the way.

Seeking Justice and Compensation

The mis-sold claims surrounding Park First have left a significant impact on the lives of thousands of investors who trusted in the promise of substantial returns. The conditional agreement reached by the FCA with the defendants, potentially providing an additional £25 million for compensation, offers a glimmer of hope. However, it is essential for affected investors to actively participate in the CVAs and ensure their voices are heard in the decision-making process.

CP Financial Claims stands ready to support investors in their pursuit of justice and rightful compensation for the losses endured due to the ill-fated Park First Scheme. As we move forward, let us stand together to empower investors affected by the Park First.

Please enter your details below for a free no-obligation chat.

Have You Been Affected?

At CP Financial Claims, our goal is utmost transparency. You'll only be charged a fee if we successfully secure financial redress for you. The success fees can range from 15% to 25% of your settlement, depending on the amount. For more information, click here.
In the event that you pursue your claims until the end but they turn out to be unsuccessful, you won't owe any payment. If you decide to cancel your claim after the 14-day cooling-off period but before the process concludes, there may be a cancellation charge. To learn more about cancellation fees, click here.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Other blog posts